Sunday, November 9, 2008

Pornography and the Slippery Slope of Ted Bundy

If you are guy who at this point somehow still considers himself the exception to every rule who’s able to manage his sexual sin, this next section should get your attention. Former Seattleite and graduate of the University of Washington, Ted Bundy became one of the nation’s most notorious and feared serial killers for beating, raping, and then murdering at least thirty girls and women between the ages of twelve and twenty-six. Shortly before he was executed, Bundy was interviewed by Christian leader James Dobson. Shockingly, Bundy admitted that he possessed none of the normal triggers for such sinful behavior, as he was raised in a loving Christian home with five siblings and did not experience any sexual abuse growing up. Rather, he confessed in clear detail how as a young boy he began, as most boys do, viewing common pornography, which grew into increasingly harder and more deviant forms of pornography that eventually led to his acting out his evil fantasies. Quoted below is an edited transcript of the conversation that occurred just seventeen hours before Ted was led to the electric chair. I trust that it will be a sobering reminder to my Christian brothers that the sin of lust is an insatiable parasite that you must not feed, lest it grow and lead to death.

James C. Dobson: It is about 2:30 in the afternoon. You are scheduled to be executed tomorrow morning at 7:00, if you don't receive another stay. What is going through your mind? What thoughts have you had in these last few days?

Ted: I won't kid you to say it is something I feel I'm in control of or have come to terms with. It's a moment-by-moment thing. Sometimes I feel very tranquil and other times I don't feel tranquil at all. What's going through my mind right now is to use the minutes and hours I have left as fruitfully as possible. It helps to live in the moment, in the essence that we use it productively. Right now I'm feeling calm, in large part because I'm here with you.

JCD: For the record, you are guilty of killing many women and girls.

Ted: Yes, that's true.

JCD: How did it happen? Take me back. What are the antecedents of the behavior that we've seen? You were raised in what you consider to be a healthy home. You were not physically, sexually or emotionally abused.

Ted: No. And that's part of the tragedy of this whole situation. I grew up in a wonderful home with two dedicated and loving parents, as one of 5 brothers and sisters. We, as children, were the focus of my parent's lives. We regularly attended church. My parents did not drink or smoke or gamble. There was no physical abuse or fighting in the home. I'm not saying it was "Leave it to Beaver", but it was a fine, solid Christian home. I hope no one will try to take the easy way out of this and accuse my family of contributing to this. I know, and I'm trying to tell you as honestly as I know how, what happened.

As a young boy of 12 or 13, I encountered, outside the home, in the local grocery and drug stores, softcore pornography. Young boys explore the sideways and byways of their neighborhoods, and in our neighborhood, people would dump the garbage. From time to time, we would come across books of a harder nature - more graphic. This also included detective magazines, etc., and I want to emphasize this. The most damaging kind of pornography - and I'm talking from hard, real, personal experience - is that that involves violence and sexual violence. The wedding of those two forces - as I know only too well - brings about behavior that is too terrible to describe.

JCD: Walk me through that. What was going on in your mind at that time?

Ted: Before we go any further, it is important to me that people believe what I'm saying. I'm not blaming pornography. I'm not saying it caused me to go out and do certain things. I take full responsibility for all the things that I've done. That's not the question here. The issue is how this kind of literature contributed and helped mold and shape the kinds of violent behavior.

JCD: It fueled your fantasies.

Ted: In the beginning, it fuels this kind of thought process. Then, at a certain time, it is instrumental in crystallizing it, making it into something that is almost a separate entity inside.

JCD: You had gone about as far as you could go in your own fantasy life, with printed material, photos, videos, etc., and then there was the urge to take that step over to a physical event.

Ted: Once you become addicted to it, and I look at this as a kind of addiction, you look for more potent, more explicit, more graphic kinds of material. Like an addiction, you keep craving something which is harder and gives you a greater sense of excitement, until you reach the point where the pornography only goes so far - that jumping off point where you begin to think maybe actually doing it will give you that which is just beyond reading about it and looking at it.

JCD: How long did you stay at that point before you actually assaulted someone?

Ted: A couple of years. I was dealing with very strong inhibitions against criminal and violent behavior. That had been conditioned and bred into me from my neighborhood, environment, church, and schools.

I knew it was wrong to think about it, and certainly, to do it was wrong. I was on the edge, and the last vestiges of restraint were being tested constantly, and assailed through the kind of fantasy life that was fueled, largely, by pornography.

JCD: Do you remember what pushed you over that edge? Do you remember the decision to "go for it"? Do you remember where you decided to throw caution to the wind?

Ted: It's a very difficult thing to describe - the sensation of reaching that point where I knew I couldn't control it anymore. The barriers I had learned as a child were not enough to hold me back from seeking out and harming somebody.

JCD: Would it be accurate to call that a sexual frenzy?

Ted: That's one way to describe it - a compulsion, a building up of this destructive energy. Another fact I haven't mentioned is the use of alcohol. In conjunction with my exposure to pornography, alcohol reduced my inhibitions and pornography eroded them further.

JCD: After you committed your first murder, what was the emotional effect? What happened in the days after that?

Ted: Even all these years later, it is difficult to talk about. Reliving it through talking about it is difficult to say the least, but I want you to understand what happened. It was like coming out of some horrible trance or dream. I can only liken it to (and I don't want to overdramatize it) being possessed by something so awful and alien, and the next morning waking up and remembering what happened and realizing that, in the eyes of the law, and certainly in the eyes of God, you're responsible. To wake up in the morning and realize what I had done with a clear mind, with all my essential moral and ethical feelings intact, absolutely horrified me.

JCD: You hadn't known you were capable of that before?

Ted: There is no way to describe the brutal urge to do that, and once it has been satisfied, or spent, and that energy level recedes, I became myself again. Basically, I was a normal person. I wasn't some guy hanging out in bars, or a bum. I wasn't a pervert in the sense that people look at somebody and say, "I know there's something wrong with him." I was a normal person. I had good friends. I led a normal life, except for this one, small but very potent and destructive segment that I kept very secret and close to myself. Those of us who have been so influenced by violence in the media, particularly pornographic violence, are not some kind of inherent monsters. We are your sons and husbands. We grew up in regular families. Pornography can reach in and snatch a kid out of any house today. It snatched me out of my home 20 or 30 years ago. As diligent as my parents were, and they were diligent in protecting their children, and as good a Christian home as we had, there is no protection against the kinds of influences that are loose in a society that tolerates....

JCD: Outside these walls, there are several hundred reporters that wanted to talk to you, and you asked me to come because you had something you wanted to say. You feel that hardcore pornography, and the door to it, softcore pornography, is doing untold damage to other people and causing other women to be abused and killed the way you did.

Ted: I'm no social scientist, and I don't pretend to believe what John Q. Citizen thinks about this, but I've lived in prison for a long time now, and I've met a lot of men who were motivated to commit violence. Without exception, every one of them was deeply involved in pornography - deeply consumed by the addiction. The F.B.I.'s own study on serial homicide shows that the most common interest among serial killers is pornography. It's true.

JCD: What would your life have been like without that influence?

Ted: I know it would have been far better, not just for me, but for a lot of other people - victims and families. There's no question that it would have been a better life. I'm absolutely certain it would not have involved this kind of violence.

JCD: If I were able to ask the kind of questions that are being asked, one would be, "Are you thinking about all those victims and their families that are so wounded? Years later, their lives aren't normal. They will never be normal. Is there remorse?"

Ted: I know people will accuse me of being self-serving, but through God's help, I have been able to come to the point, much too late, where I can feel the hurt and the pain I am responsible for. Yes. Absolutely! During the past few days, myself and a number of investigators have been talking about unsolved cases - murders I was involved in. It's hard to talk about all these years later, because it revives all the terrible feelings and thoughts that I have steadfastly and diligently dealt with - I think successfully. It has been reopened and I have felt the pain and the horror of that. I hope that those who I have caused so much grief, even if they don't believe my expression of sorrow, will believe what I'm saying now; there are those loose in their towns and communities, like me, whose dangerous impulses are being fueled, day in and day out, by violence in the media in its various forms - particularly sexualized violence. What scares me is when I see what's on cable T.V. Some of the violence in the movies that come into homes today is stuff they wouldn't show in X-rated adult theatres 30 years ago.

JCD: The slasher movies?

Ted: That is the most graphic violence on screen, especially when children are unattended or unaware that they could be a Ted Bundy; that they could have a predisposition to that kind of behavior.

JCD: One of the final murders you committed was 12-year-old Kimberly Leach. I think the public outcry is greater there because an innocent child was taken from a playground. What did you feel after that? Were they the normal emotions after that?

Ted: I can't really talk about that right now. It's too painful. I would like to be able to convey to you what that experience is like, but I won't be able to talk about that. I can't begin to understand the pain that the parents of these children and young women that I have harmed feel. And I can't restore much to them, if anything. I won't pretend to, and I don't even expect them to forgive me. I'm not asking for it. That kind of forgiveness is of God; if they have it, they have it, and if they don't, maybe they'll find it someday.

JCD: Do you deserve the punishment the state has inflicted upon you?

Ted: That's a very good question. I don't want to die; I won't kid you. I deserve, certainly, the most extreme punishment society has. And I think society deserves to be protected from me and from others like me. That's for sure. What I hope will come of our discussion is that I think society deserves to be protected from itself. As we have been talking, there are forces at loose in this country, especially this kind of violent pornography, where, on one hand, well-meaning people will condemn the behavior of a Ted Bundy while they're walking past a magazine rack full of the very kinds of things that send young kids down the road to being Ted Bundys. That's the irony. I'm talking about going beyond retribution, which is what people want with me. There is no way in the world that killing me is going to restore those beautiful children to their parents and correct and soothe the pain. But there are lots of other kids playing in streets around the country today who are going to be dead tomorrow, and the next day, because other young people are reading and seeing the kinds of things that are available in the media today.

JCD: There is tremendous cynicism about you on the outside, I suppose, for good reason. I'm not sure there's anything you could say that people would believe, yet you told me (and I have heard this through our mutual friend, John Tanner) that you have accepted the forgiveness of Jesus Christ and are a follower and believer in Him. Do you draw strength from that as you approach these final hours?

Ted: I do. I can't say that being in the Valley of the Shadow of Death is something I've become all that accustomed to, and that I'm strong and nothing's bothering me. It's no fun. It gets kind of lonely, yet I have to remind myself that every one of us will go through this someday in one way or another.

JCD: It's appointed unto man.

Ted: Countless millions who have walked this earth before us have gone through this, so this is just an experience we all share.

Ted Bundy was executed at 7:15 am the day after this conversation was recorded.

In closing, sin leads to death. Jesus died for your sin. You are in a war. Be a man. Put your sin to death.

Relit.org

Monday, September 15, 2008

Idols

Idols-Mark Driscoll (6min)

This is a must listen. It has been so convicting for us here.




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Download

http://www.1031sermonjams.com/

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Voxpop:My heart is an idol factory and needs an emergency shut-off switch

Voxpopnetwork.com

Reforming The Feminine

"If I had to sell the junk my heart has been producing this week, I would be bankrupt and starving. No matter how prettily I package it, how cleverly I market it, or how cheap the price, no one would want it.

For those of you that read my last post, My Family, My Idol, you read about the turbulent time I’ve been having since confronting my family about past sin. Going into those conversations, my heart was soft and God had brought me to a place of repentance and a genuine desire to speak His truth, offer grace and forgiveness to my family, and seek reconciliation. The past few months, however, of sitting in the mess of disappointment, re-wounding, and broken relationship has taken a toll on my heart.

I thought I was prepared for whatever response and outcome that God had planned for my family. And although I believe my heart was pure leading up to the conversations, it has hardened in the aftermath of my family’s response, which was nothing close to what I had hoped for. I wanted my family to experience what grace means and to accept my forgiveness. I wanted them to grieve over what happened and take responsibility for their part. And most of all, I wanted them to come to know and love Jesus.

None of that has happened and this week God revealed to me that my initial grace and forgiveness was not offered with God’s heart. I found myself taking it back and turning away in anger and pride. My desire for reconciliation and justice (as I have defined them) has taken precedence over everything else. Not only am I still struggling with the idol of worshipping my family by wanting “peace” at all costs, but I have also added the idol of a need for reconciliation on my terms.

The ugliness of my heart runs deep. After months of my forgiveness getting thrown back in my face, the conversations in the darkest places of my heart went something like this. “I’m offering grace, dammit. Take my freakin’ forgiveness. Screw that! Why should I be vulnerable in relationships when I’m just going to get hurt? Why give up control when I seem to manage just fine on my own?”

It’s ugly, I know."

-------------More...

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

My family, My Idol

Some of us have had to do the same. Please read, very encouraging:

"God created us to worship. It’s how we’re made. So when we’re not properly worshiping Him, our hearts are quickly drawn to a cheap replacement. For me, that has been my family. Which is rather confusing since family in itself is a good thing. But it can easily take the form of idolatry when I choose family over Jesus. Let me explain.

As a single woman, I have held my family above Christ by refusing to speak truth at the risk of disrupting my family’s so-called peace or potentially losing relationship with them altogether. I knew God was calling me to bring into the light past family sin that had never been discussed since it occurred 27 years ago. I could see how it could be used to show them God’s grace by coming to them in truth and forgiveness. And although there was great possibility to see lives transformed, I sinned against God by instead choosing my family and my own comfort because the risk was too high."
----------------- More...

Saturday, August 16, 2008

1 Corinthians 11- 5th post

The Post that started this all can be found here: Head coverings study

----

It is dishonoring to the man when the woman is not covered, beacause of Vs. 9-10.
"9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
10 For this cause ought the woman to have power (a sign of authority) on her head because of the angels." (KJV)

The reason that a woman should be covered, is because it is a sign that she is under authority of the man. If she is not covered, she is saying that she is not under authority of the man. This is true, regardless of the presence of a man. Please look at the chapter carefully. The point is not so much men and women together in spiritual exercise. That may or may not be the case. The point is men and womens spiritual position before God. Prayer, as mentioned in Vs. 5 may occur without, the presence of a man. However, she still should have power (a veil showing that she is under authority) on her head because of the angels, and beacause, as in Vs. 9, she was made for the man. The covering is there show God's order. The womans head is what needs to be covered, in Vs. 5,6,10. The covering then, is not to cover the womans hair, but her head.

Please see, that Pauls main concern is that the womans head be covered. He does not mention in this chapter that a womans hair needs to be covered. If a woman wears a piece of cloth to cover her hair, then what is covering her head? Paul does not mention a covering as having two purposes. It says in verse 5 that a woman praying or prophesying with her head uncovered, dishonors her head.

You are covering your hair not your head. This presents a big problem, as you are according to Vs. 5 dishonoring your head.

If her hair is not covering her, Paul is saying, she dishonors her head, and that is just as shameful, as if she is shaved. So if a womans hair isn't covering her, she should be shaved, but if it is a shame for a woman to be shaved, let her be covered. Paul here seems to be putting the woman in a corner, where her only option is to have long hair. I would like to review the definitions of the "cover" words (uncovered, covering, covered, cover); With word in verse 15 the only exeption, the greek word behind them is (or is a version of):

2619 katakalupto kat-ak-al-oop'-to

from 2596 and 2572;

AV-cover 3; 3
Meaning:
1) to cover up
2) to veil or cover one's self`

The word for covering in verse 15 is:

4018 peribolaion per-ib-ol'-ah-yon

from a presumed derivative of 4016; ; n n

AV-covering 1, vesture 1; 2

1) a covering thrown around, a wrapper
1a) a mantle
1b) a veil

They both mean veil, but "peribolaion", used only in Vs. 15, is simply a more descriptive term, which he uses to give physical reference to what he meant earlier in the chapter in his use of the "cover" words.

Please note, that it never says in the entire chapter that the woman needs to be covered, so that the man's glory will not be shown before God. The reason that a woman needs to be covered is not, so that the man's glory will be concealed. The reason she should be covered is to witness to the angels, that she was created for, and under the authority of the man. See Vs. 9+10.

Authority is the whole point of this passage, the womans covering is supposed to show that she is under the authority of the man.


[The phrase, "Because of the angels" in Vs. 10, may be a refrence to the fall. When, both the woman, and the angel, Lucifer were both acting outside of the authority over them. Lucifer, rejecting God's supremacy over him, the woman doing the same with the man, rejecting his authority over her. Thus the covering is a testimony to angels, that as she is under the man's authority, so should they be under God's authority.

Isaiah 44:13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.

Genesis 3:17 ¶ And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;

In Ezekiel 28:13-17

"Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy
covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the
jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the
workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day
that thou wast created. Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I
have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked
up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.Thou wast perfect in thy ways
from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.By the
multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with
violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of
the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the
midst of the stones of fire.
Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy
wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will
lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee."]



Wednesday, August 13, 2008

1 Corinthians 11

The origional post that started this discussion can be found here: head coverings study

--

Me and Teresa spent quite a few hours today, restudying 1 Corinthians 11. We wrote what we found. May it be a blessing.

*ESV quoted unless otherwise noted. Strongs' numbers included with greek definitions*

"The chapter 1 Corinthians 11, is not necassarily talking about men and women spiritually exercising together. It only mentions the womans position in the lord, and how it relates to men and their position in the Lord. Obviously, the definition of prophesying: "1Co 14:3 But he that prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort. (KJV)" means that there must be at least two people present. But this does not have to be a time when men and women are formally coming before the Lord (church). Regardless of whether men and women are seperated, together or formally coming before god, is is shameful for a woman to pray (she may pray alone) or prophesy with her head uncovered, and vice-versa with the man.

5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.

If a woman is praying or prophesying (edifying, exhorting, and comforting [1 Cor 14:3]) at any time, she should be covered. If Teresa (a sister here) is in a taxi by herself, and she starts praying, she should be covered. If she starts comforting, edifying or exhorting another christian, at any time, she should be covered.

What is the reason for being covered or uncovered, according to this chapter? For the man the reason is: Vs. 7 For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. (ESV)

So, the man should be uncovered, because he is the image and glory of god.
Why should the woman be covered? See Vs. 8 to 10:

8 For man was not made from woman, but woman from man.
9 Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.
10 That is why a wife* ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. (ESV)
*[greek: 1135 gune goo-nay', meaning: 1) a woman of any age, whether a virgin, or married, or a widow]

The words "symbol of authority" is the greek word: "1849 exousia ex-oo-see'-ah".
Meaning: 4d) a sign of the husband's authority over his wife 4d1) the veil with which propriety required a women to cover herself.

The woman should be covered (have a symbol of [the mans] authority [over her] on her head), beacause she was created for the man.

The next two verses 11 and 12, clarify any misunderstanding or chance of abuse: "11 Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man nor man of woman; 12 for as woman was made from man, so man is now born of woman. And all things are from God. (ESV)". So, the reason for the covering is to show that she was made for the man, and thus under his authority. Thus the reason that a woman needs to be covered is not to conceal her glory, but instead, to show that she is made for and under the authority of the man. It never says in the chapter that the womans hair or glory needs to be covered. Rather the covering is to cover her head. See the verses below and Vs. 5 and 6.

What is the covering?

13 Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a wife* to pray to God with her head uncovered?
14 Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him,
15 but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering. (ESV)
*[greek: 1135 gune goo-nay', meaning: 1) a woman of any age, whether a virgin, or married, or a widow]


Verse 15 gives a description of the covering. (In this chapter, the covering is never described as a piece of material.) It says first of all "long hair". Second of all, the word covering in this verse is a different word in the greek that all the other "cover(ings)' in this chapter. Beside "covered" in verse 4, all the "cover" words are: 2619 katakalupto kat-ak-al-oop'-to, in the greek. This word means: 1) to cover up 2) to veil or cover one's self. However in verse 15, the word "covering" is: 4018 peribolaion per-ib-ol'-ah-yon, in the greek. This word meaning: 1) a covering thrown around, a wrapper 1a) a mantle 1b) a veil. Paul seems to use verse 15 to describe his use of covering in the previous verses so as to give example of what it looks like physically. So a woman's hair should be able to be thrown around her or wrap her.

Literally Vs. 15 says: "but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a [covering thrown around, a wrapper, a mantle, or veil.]"

All the other verses say that a woman or her head should be covered, and none of them say that her hair needs to be covered. Paul in verse 15 tells what the covering is: "her hair is given to her for a covering"

However Vs. 16 adds: "If anyone is inclined to be contentious, we have no such practice, nor do the churches of God. (ESV)". So dont fight about this issue (maybe hair length, or the whole issue of head covering)."

Teresa and Caleb

Brethren pray for us. Pray for Souren, Bagrat, Narek, and Arsen (his salvation) also.


Our Lord come, and may he find faith on the earth!

Monday, August 11, 2008

head coverings study

Me and Teresa spent several hours yesterdAY studying 1 Corinthians 11.

We were looking at head coverings, and came to some different conclusions.

~~~~

*Verses are from 1 Cor 11 unless said otherwise*

*Please not that the word woman in KJV is sometimes translated wife in the ESV (used below)*

I Corinthians 11:4 + 5
4 Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head, 5 but every wife (KJV: woman) who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, since it is the same as if her head were shaven.

Please note that this chapter never mentions the bodily presence of men or women. It simply states that when a woman prays or prophecys (Prophecy according to 1 Corinthians 14:3 is, "edification, exhortation, and comfort") with her head uncovered, she dishonors her head. Thus, when a woman, prays, edifies, exhorts, or comforts, she should have her head covered. If she doesn’t, or the man does (have their heads covered), while praying or prophesying, they dishonor their head. Verses 8-12 describe the position of men and women. These verses, seem to be an interjection explaining why he even mentions coverings:

"8 For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. 9 Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10 That is why a wife ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. 11 Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man nor man of woman; 12 for as woman was made from man, so man is now born of woman. And all things are from God."

Please note also that the context of this passage, is NOT church.


What is the covering?!! It says: "For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should cut her hair short. (be shaved KJV)" 1 Cor 11:6, "But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head." Verse 10: "for this cause ought the woman to have power (a sign of the husbands authority over his wife, or veil {Strong’s ref:1849}) on her head because of the angels". Verse 15 of this chapter describes the covering: "But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.". Verses 8-12 describe the position of men and women. These verses, seem to be an interjection explaining why he even mentions coverings, and to remind men that they are not better than the women:

"8 For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. 9 Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10 That is why a wife ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. 11 Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man nor man of woman; 12 for as woman was made from man, so man is now born of woman. And all things are from God."

Verse 13 and 14 answer, and directly correlate to vs. 6 and 7.

Vs 6: 6 For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should cut her hair short. But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head.

Vs 13: 13 Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a wife to pray to God with her head uncovered?

Vs 7: 7 For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man.

Vs 14: 14 Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him,


Vs 4: 4 Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head,


15 but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering.


I guess, I have been studying this and I wonder why I even consider that the covering is something other than a woman’s long hair. It never says in the whole chapter that a woman’s hair should be covered. It says that her head should be covered. I see it now as the woman’s long hair as her covering. How long? Well that is what I see vs. 6 as talking about (in a complicated way). If a woman’s hair doesn’t cover her, she should be shaved. But it’s a shame for a woman to be shaved vs. 13 implies: " Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a wife to pray to God with her head uncovered?" So, a woman’s hair should cover her (the word covering in vs. 15 means, "1) a covering thrown around, a wrapper 1a) a mantle 1b) a veil"). Paul calms any dispute about this in vs. 16: "But if any man seems to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God."

Caleb